# Copts under the Umayyads

Source: https://coptic-lore-forge.lovable.app/wiki/copts-under-the-umayyads — Coptic Orthodox Wiki (updated 2026-10-02)

Copts under the Umayyads were the Egyptian Christian community living under the Damascus-based dynasty from 661 to 750. They remained important in taxation, provincial administration, and naval labor while facing changing fiscal and religious policies. Documentary and ecclesiastical sources offer contrasting perspectives on coercion, conversion, and the gradual spread of Arabic.

## Historical setting

The Umayyad dynasty ruled from 661 to 750, with its capital at Damascus; Egypt was governed by Arab officials appointed by the caliph.[^1] The supplied accounts differ in their interpretation of this period: narratives of ecclesiastical suffering stand alongside documentary studies emphasizing administrative continuity and gradual social change.[^2][^6][^7]

The dynasty took its name from the Banu Umayyah, a merchant family of Mecca, and established the first hereditary dynasty of the Islamic world following a civil war.[^14] Its empire extended as far as France in the west and India in the east, while Egypt was administered from Damascus as a province of Syria.[^15] Umayyad favoritism toward ethnic Arabs, particularly documented for Syria, Iraq, and the Persian-speaking East, produced discrimination against non-Arab converts and explains the frequent description of the polity as the “Arab Empire.”[^16]

## Background: conquest and the Coptic church

The religious divisions inherited by Umayyad Egypt had developed under Byzantine rule: after the Council of Chalcedon in 451, the imperial authorities adhered to the Melchite confession, which the Copts rejected.[^17] Under Cyrus al-Muqawqas, Patriarch Benjamin I fled Alexandria and spent years moving between desert monasteries to avoid arrest.[^18] One account presents Copts as initially standing aside during the Arab-Byzantine struggle and reports, following John of Nikiou, that some subsequently supplied the Muslims with fodder and provisions.[^19] Another account cautions that the Copts were not a unified body welcoming the invaders and emphasizes the strong resistance encountered in Delta towns after the fall of Pelusium in 639.[^20] The fortress of Babylon fell on 6 April 641, while Alexandria passed into Arab hands on 29 September 642 after the departure of Byzantine troops.[^21]

Under ‘Amr ibn al-‘As, Benjamin emerged again at Alexandria, was honored by the Muslim conquerors, and was permitted to occupy numerous churches previously appropriated by the Melchites.[^22] The Covenant of ‘Umar, ascribed to Caliph ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab (634–644), was regarded as a fundamental document governing relations with Jewish and Christian dhimmi subjects, including the Copts.[^23] An account of Coptic architecture likewise states that church construction and maintenance were guaranteed in principle by the surrender treaty of 641.[^24]

## Administration and taxation

Greek, Coptic, and Arabic papyri indicate that administration after the Arab conquest depended substantially on the Coptic church and provincial Coptic notables. Central officials assigned an overall tax assessment to each agricultural district, while local Egyptian intermediaries apportioned the burden among villagers.[^2]

The documentary interpretation explains this dependence partly by the limited initial Arab settlement: apart from a few high-ranking personnel, it places Arab settlement in Egypt roughly half a century after the conquest.[^25] It identifies the revenues from Egypt's celebrated agricultural wealth and the poll tax on non-Muslims as central Umayyad interests, with fiscal intervention eventually reshaping administrative and social relations.[^26] The local intermediary, often a churchman, not only assessed individual villagers but also collected their taxes.[^27]

Between approximately 715 and 740, the administration changed the fiscal classification of Egyptian land from treaty to nontreaty status, reportedly doubling its tax rate. The account connects this change, provisionally, with tax revolts beginning in 725, involving first Copts and subsequently both Arabs and Copts.[^8]

The same documentary study cautions that kharaj, in the precise juridical sense of land conquered without treaty, is not attested in the Umayyad papyri, and notes that the periodic revolts continued into Abbasid times.[^28]

The government also began assessing farmers individually and, around 717, attempted to replace Coptic administrative personnel with Muslims. Documentary evidence nevertheless indicates that Coptic officials remained in office well into the eighth century.[^2] Excessive assessments could drive cultivators from their land and cause the church to lose holdings occupied by tenant farmers.[^9]

Some officials reportedly overassessed landholders deliberately in order to dispossess them and acquire their land.[^29] Coptic church sources interpreted the loss of landed tenure and of their intermediary position between government and cultivators as religious persecution.[^30]

An account of early Muslim taxation describes the capitulation terms as supposedly fixing jizyah at two dinars per adult male, with an additional land tax on provincial landowners, including churches, and obligations to supply clothing and hospitality to itinerant Muslims.[^31] That account nevertheless warns that later chroniclers and jurists supplied divergent theoretical explanations, whereas contemporary evidence reveals frequent changes in fiscal status and in the levels and incidence of taxation rather than a consistently fixed system.[^32]

The pagarch remained an important provincial administrative officer, documented in the correspondence of Qurrah with Basilius of Aphrodito and of Papas, pagarch of Apollonos Ano, with the amir of the Thebaid.[^33] The same account describes large estates and autopract domains of Coptic landowners as being abolished and appropriated for allotment, while the pagarchic system itself survived beyond Umayyad rule.[^34]

## Church and government

Ecclesiastical accounts describe extraordinary levies on bishops, monks, and patriarchs. One passage reports that al-Asbagh imposed additional taxation on monks and demanded 2,000 dinars from each bishop beyond the normal kharaj assessment.[^10] During the selection of Kha’il I, patriarch from 744 to 767, the governor Hafs ibn al-Walid required the candidate to appear before him before consecration; the delegation's accompanying appeal for tax relief was unsuccessful.[^11]

Policies varied between rulers and could change within a reign. The account of ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd al-‘Aziz (717–720) describes initial relief for churches and episcopates, followed by a requirement that government employees be Muslim. It reports that Yazid II (720–724) restored suppressed imposts and ordered the destruction of crosses and sacred images, while portraying Hisham (724–743) more favorably.[^3]

‘Umar's initial measures also directed officials to restore ruined towns and villages; the ecclesiastical narrative associates the subsequent reversal with the appointment of Ayyub ibn Sharhabil as governor in 717.[^35] The History of the Patriarchs expresses its condemnation of the employment requirement by comparing ‘Umar to Antichrist, while describing Hisham as God-fearing and a deliverer of the Orthodox.[^36]

## Coercion, epidemic, and wartime requisitions

The narrative of Alexander II's patriarchate describes a recurring pattern in which newly appointed governors demanded payments beyond jizyah and kharaj, causing inhabitants to flee their homes.[^37] It reports attempts to recover and control fugitives through tattooing, cauterizing, and restraints of lead or iron, together with confiscations of cattle, property, and the estates of deceased persons that would otherwise have passed to their heirs.[^38] In this account, religious personnel lost earlier exemptions, while imprisonment, flogging, amputation, and killing were among the punishments inflicted on subjects who failed to meet demands.[^39]

The accession of al-Walid ibn ‘Abd al-Malik brought replacements among provincial officials, including Qurrah's appointment in 709; the same narrative reports that a plague killed both Copts and Muslims and claimed Qurrah himself in 714.[^40] His successor, ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Rifa‘ah al-Fahmi (714–717), is said to have taken office during a famine whose mortality exceeded that of the preceding plague.[^41]

In its account of preparations surrounding the siege of Constantinople, the ecclesiastical narrative places a prohibition on hosting Byzantine sailors in the period beginning in 716 and attributes a severe disruption of international trade to that restriction.[^42] It also connects the financing of Byzantine expeditions with the seizure of gold and silver sacramental vessels, colored marble pillars, and carved wooden structures from churches for nonreligious use.[^43] Some monasteries were reportedly invaded or ruined, and monks were carried away for forced work in the Islamic fleet.[^44]

## Patriarchal rivalry and the final Umayyad years

During Alexander II's patriarchate, a Chalcedonian named Anastasius reportedly bribed the governor to install a Chalcedonian physician, Onopus, on the throne of Saint Mark in Alexander's place.[^45] Opposition from the Alexandrian population frustrated the attempt, after which Onopus withdrew his claim and asked forgiveness.[^46]

The account of Kha’il I describes Hafs being pursued by a new governor, Hawtharah, who burned him alive, killed most of his supporters, and confiscated their property.[^47] Despite this violence, the History of the Patriarchs portrays Hawtharah favorably toward the Orthodox and says that, while residing with his army at Wasim for three years, he consulted Abba Moses about the salvation of his soul.[^48]

Under Marwan II (744–750), a Chalcedonian goldsmith in the caliph's household, Theophylact, obtained appointment as patriarch of the Greeks under the name Cosmas, in opposition to Kha’il.[^49] The governor ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Musa ibn Nasir supported Cosmas's effort to recover Byzantine churches occupied by Copts after the conquest, including the cathedral of Saint Menas at Mareotis, which the account attributes to Emperor Arcadius.[^50] A heated dispute followed, in which the narrative credits Kha’il's eloquence and reasoning with prevailing over the Chalcedonian claim, despite attempts to influence the outcome through bribery.[^51] Prolonged discussions about restoring unity between the two churches were subsequently overshadowed by a pestilence.[^52]

Government demands for extraordinary payments affected both patriarchs, and Kha’il sought permission to travel to Upper Egypt to collect the required funds.[^53] His involvement in a dispute between the king of Nubia and the king's bishop also brought political danger: after an exchange of letters between king and patriarch, the Egyptian governor learned of the matter and seized Kha’il.[^54]

## Conversion and its interpretation

The passages offer different explanations of conversion. Ecclesiastical narratives emphasize financial burdens and pressure on officeholders, whereas another interpretation stresses the church's weakening economic and social position and the possible attraction of joining the ruling class to protect property.[^3][^9][^10]

A further account maintains that conversion was generally discouraged under the Umayyads and did not necessarily bring exemption from the poll tax. This differs in emphasis from accounts of rulers requiring Muslim affiliation for government service; the passages do not establish a single, consistently applied policy throughout the dynasty.[^3][^12] The documentary interpretation characterizes conversion overall as very slow.[^9]

The interpretation emphasizing discouraged conversion also points to its potential social cost, since converts could face isolation or exclusion within their former confessional community.[^55] It relates this problem to the character of al-Fustat, which remained predominantly a provincial Arab garrison and administrative outpost rather than the expanding Muslim urban center visible by approximately the end of the ninth century.[^56] In that analysis, the absence of mass conversion limited the migration that might otherwise have made al-Fustat an attractive destination for converts, while the town's limited opportunities reinforced the lack of an immediate incentive to convert.[^57]

For comparison beyond the Umayyad period, the documentary study observes that parties to published Arabic legal documents remained overwhelmingly Coptic, as indicated by names and genealogies, even as late as the eleventh century.[^58] It interprets combinations of Muslim and Christian personal names and patronymics in contracts as evidence that intermarriage contributed to conversion among provincial people otherwise largely absent from urban Muslim biographical writing.[^59] Examples include a woman with a Coptic patronymic marrying a man with a Muslim name and patronymic, and a state official with a Muslim name and patronymic whose mother's name and patronymic were Coptic.[^60] Because Islamic jurisprudence required Muslim witnesses, the study also considers that some contract witnesses with mixed naming patterns may have been recent converts or members of recently converted families.[^61]

## Language and law

A narrative account places an order to replace Coptic with Arabic in tax registers under al-Walid ibn ‘Abd al-Malik.[^6][^13] This administrative measure should be distinguished from everyday language use: eighth-century private contracts continued to be written in Coptic, and Muslim authorities adjudicated disputes between Christians using contracts in Coptic and Greek.[^4]

Contracting parties retained a choice of documentary language, and officials continued to offer Coptic as an option as late as fifteen years after their assumption of judicial authority around 718.[^62] The documentary study interprets that practice as evidence both of officials' familiarity with Coptic legal formularies and of their recognition as valid before Muslim jurists.[^63] Coptic, Greek, and Arabic contract forms displayed numerous parallels without being identical: Arabic contracts from Umayyad Egypt included distinctive clauses and modified earlier Egyptian wording to conform to Islamic norms.[^64]

The slow spread of spoken Arabic is illustrated by tenth-century contracts from the Fayyum stating that a document had been read to the seller in Arabic and explained in the “foreign language,” evidence that the study places within a continuing lack of provincial arabization three centuries after the conquest.[^65]

## Naval contribution

Arabic, Greek, and Coptic documents attest to Christian Egyptian participation in building and manning the Umayyad fleet. Medieval Arabic accounts report an order to send one thousand Copts with their families to assist shipyard and fleet construction at Tunis. The evidence remains fragmentary, and the extent of Coptic participation, particularly in combat, is uncertain.[^5]

The strategic purpose of recruiting Egyptian skilled labor was to build or refit ships capable of countering Byzantine maritime supremacy in the Mediterranean.[^66] Accounts by al-Bakri, al-Raqiq al-Qayrawani, and al-Tjani attribute the Tunis order to Caliph ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan (685–705), who instructed his brother ‘Abd al-‘Aziz, governor of Egypt, to send the workers to Hassan ibn al-Nu‘man, commander of the Arab forces in North Africa.[^67] The naval study identifies this as the only historical text explicitly naming Copts, whereas other texts refer more broadly to Christians or non-Muslim Egyptians or imply Coptic participation without naming it.[^68]

The Byzantine chronicler Theophanes, who died in 818, reports that the fleet attacking Constantinople in 717–718 under Emperor Leo III sailed principally from Egypt and received reinforcements from Africa, identified in the study as Tunisia.[^69] Alongside the Byzantine use of Greek fire, he credits the attack's failure to Egyptians who escaped to the city in small boats from merchant vessels and supplied information about the Muslim fleet.[^70] The study understands these Egyptians as non-Arab sailors and the reference to merchant vessels as evidence of Christian service aboard supply ships, rather than proof of their participation in combat.[^71]

## Differing assessments of the sources

The governor Qurrah ibn Sharik illustrates the disagreement between accounts. One narrative depicts his administration as especially harsh; another argues that the Arabic and Greek Qurrah Papyri reveal a careful and effective administrator, in contrast to hostile later portrayals. These differing assessments caution against treating either characterization as uncontested.[^6][^7]

This disagreement occurred within the circumstances of the Abbasid overthrow of the Umayyads in 750, a revolution associated with discontent among non-Arab converts and an ensuing increase in Persian influence.[^72] Abbasid accounts served to justify the overthrow and persecution of their predecessors, and nineteenth-century European histories compounded that partisan inheritance with an imperial outlook blaming Islam for Egypt's decline.[^73] The article's contributor was affiliated with Iona College.[^74]

Coptic survival under Arab rule depended on two sustaining factors: adherence to the church as a comprehensive spiritual way of life and Muslim rulers' continuing acceptance of Copts as useful participants in state affairs.[^75] Spirituality and public service were complementary resources for communal endurance, rather than survival being understood solely through episodes of persecution.[^76]

## Frequently asked questions

**What administrative roles did Copts hold under the Umayyads?**
Coptic churchmen and provincial notables apportioned and collected local taxes. Despite efforts to replace them with Muslims around 717, documents show Coptic officials continuing in office well into the eighth century.

**Did conversion to Islam always remove the poll tax?**
No. One account states that conversion was generally discouraged under the Umayyads and did not always bring exemption from jizyah; other accounts emphasize pressure on government employees to become Muslim.

**Did Arabic immediately replace Coptic?**
No. An order introduced Arabic into tax registers, but Coptic remained a language of private contracts, and Muslim authorities accepted documents written in Coptic and Greek.

**How did Copts contribute to the Umayyad fleet?**
Christian Egyptians helped build, refit, and man ships. Arabic accounts describe the dispatch of one thousand Copts with their families to Tunis, but their participation in naval combat remains uncertain.

**Why do accounts of Umayyad treatment of Copts differ?**
Ecclesiastical narratives emphasize extraordinary levies and suffering, while documentary studies highlight administrative continuity and gradual change. The latter also question the influence of hostile Abbasid portrayals on later histories.

## Sources
[^1]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 612)
[^2]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 613)
[^3]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 225)
[^4]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 617)
[^5]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 609)
[^6]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 224)
[^7]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 612)
[^8]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 613)
[^9]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 616)
[^10]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 223)
[^11]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 146)
[^12]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 671)
[^13]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 225)
[^14]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 612)
[^15]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 612)
[^16]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 612)
[^17]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 830)
[^18]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 833)
[^19]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 830)
[^20]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 692)
[^21]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 692)
[^22]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 833)
[^23]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 830)
[^24]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 675)
[^25]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 613)
[^26]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 613)
[^27]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 613)
[^28]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 613)
[^29]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 616)
[^30]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 616)
[^31]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 485)
[^32]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 485)
[^33]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 485)
[^34]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 485)
[^35]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 225)
[^36]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 225)
[^37]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 224)
[^38]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 224)
[^39]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 224)
[^40]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 224)
[^41]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 224)
[^42]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 225)
[^43]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 225)
[^44]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 225)
[^45]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 225)
[^46]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 225)
[^47]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 147)
[^48]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 147)
[^49]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 147)
[^50]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 147)
[^51]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 147)
[^52]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 147)
[^53]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 147)
[^54]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 147)
[^55]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 671)
[^56]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 671)
[^57]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 671)
[^58]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 616)
[^59]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 616)
[^60]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 616)
[^61]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 616)
[^62]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 617)
[^63]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 617)
[^64]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 617)
[^65]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 617)
[^66]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 609)
[^67]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 609)
[^68]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 609)
[^69]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 609)
[^70]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 609)
[^71]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 609)
[^72]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 612)
[^73]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 612)
[^74]: The Coptic Encyclopedia — Introduction, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 22)
[^75]: The Coptic Encyclopedia — Introduction, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 63)
[^76]: The Coptic Encyclopedia — Introduction, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 63)