# Festal tune

Source: https://coptic-lore-forge.lovable.app/wiki/festal-tune — Coptic Orthodox Wiki (updated 2026-10-02)

The festal tune, called al-faraiḥī, is a Coptic Orthodox melody type used for feasts, weddings, and baptisms. It belongs to a system organized by liturgical occasion rather than the eight-mode Oktoechos. Transmitted orally, it employs traditional musical formulae that identify the occasion while allowing cantors some variation in performance.

## Definition and use

The **festal tune**, called **al-faraiḥī**, is one of six main melody types identified in Coptic music for ordinary days and special occasions. It is used for feasts, weddings, and baptisms.[^1]

This classification distinguishes al-faraiḥī from the daily melody, the melody for Advent, those for fasting periods and the week before Easter, and al-sha‘anīnī, used on Palm Sunday and feasts of the Cross.[^1]

Kuhn names the daily melody al-sanawī, including Adam and Batos, the Advent melody Kiyahk, the fasting melody al-ṣiyāmī, and the melody for the week before Easter al-ḥazainī.[^8]

This classification of Coptic chant by liturgical occasion differs from the eight-mode system known as the Oktoechos; Coptic melodies were not classified in that system.[^4]

Kuhn also distinguishes this system from the Arabic maqām, while Marian Robertson’s discussion of the term *lahn* leaves open the possibility of affinities with Byzantine *echos* and Arabic *maqam* that require further elucidation.[^9]

## Hymnody and terminology

The Arabic term **lahn**, whose plural is **alhan**, is used in Coptic liturgical books and manuscripts to specify the music for a text and translates a Coptic term adopted from the Greek *ekhos*.[^10] Rendered in English as “air,” “tone,” “melody,” or “mode,” it can designate either a particular melody or a recognizable melody type; Robertson gives *Lahn al-Farah*, meaning a melody of joy, and *Lahn al-Huzn*, meaning a melody of sorrow, as examples of descriptive names.[^11]

Another ecclesiastical term for an air, tune, or hymn is **waham**, properly pronounced *woham*, with the plurals *wahamat* or *wohamati*; derived from Coptic *bohem*, it is described by Emile Maher Ishaq as occurring only in ritual manuscripts.[^36]

The relationship between text and tune is not necessarily one-to-one: in the broader Coptic repertoire, the same text can be sung to different alhan, and the same lahn can carry different texts.[^12] A lahn may also have short (*qasir*), abridged (*mukhtasar*), and long (*tawil*) forms.[^13] Kuhn notes that familiar melodies themselves, not only the formulae within them, serve as memory aids when different hymns are sung to them.[^14]

The naming of alhan is documented in the fourteenth century, with approximately twenty-six listed, most of which are still known; some were designated *sanawiyyah* and sung throughout the year, while others were reserved for a single occasion.[^37]

Within this broader terminology, hymns labeled Adam are assigned to Sunday through Tuesday and certain specified days, whereas Batos hymns are assigned to Wednesday through Saturday, the evening service, and Holy Week.[^38] Their names come from the opening words of the Monday and Thursday Theotokias for Kiyahk, respectively referring to Adam and to the bush seen by Moses.[^39] Adam and Batos differ in verse structure, length, and mood, while their music differs little in contemporary practice and both can occur within one service.[^40]

## Liturgical performance and related festal rubrics

The broader liturgical tradition in which the festal tune is performed is monodic and primarily unaccompanied vocal music, sung by men except for certain responses assigned to the whole congregation.[^41] Small hand cymbals, called *sanj* or colloquially *sajjat*, and the metal triangle, called *muthallath* or colloquially *turianta*, accompany specified hymns and responses in many Coptic churches.[^42] Played by deacons and/or the cantor, these percussion instruments provide rhythmic support, signal the congregation to participate, and help unify the singing.[^43]

The core of this musical repertoire is in the Divine Liturgy, whose texts are intended to be sung except for the Creed and the Dismissal.[^59]

Seasonal musical directions also occur in the midnight psalmody: the Tobhat, a litany of saints and intercessions, are sung, like the Doxologies, to a melody type called Watus that varies with the season.[^44] The Tobhat contain seventy-four verses or prayers during the year and eighty-three in Kiyahk.[^45] On all feasts of Our Lord, the sequence is shortened to the verse naming Claudius, Theodore, Apa Iskhron, and Apa Isaac, or, according to the ritual manuscript *Tartib al-Bi‘ah*, to the verse of Saint George, after which the final three verses are added.[^46]

The singular *tubh* is an Egyptian Arabic ecclesiastical term derived from Coptic *tobh*, meaning prayer or to pray; the prayers in this midnight litany begin with an appeal to pray to the Lord, *tobh amebshays*.[^60]

## Musical structure

Magdalena Kuhn describes al-faraiḥī as one of the less well-known melodies whose use of musical formulae can vary, contrasting it with the more consistently arranged formulae of the daily and Advent melodies.[^2]

In Kuhn’s account of Coptic melodic practice, formulae are clusters of notes that can be repeated or placed at different points in a chant. They allow cantors to lengthen or shorten vocalises. The opening formula identifies the melody for a particular feast day and is fixed by tradition, while subsequent formulae allow greater freedom of selection and placement.[^3]

Kuhn adds that the opening formula is shared by professional and lay singers alike, and that an experienced cantor can recognize a melody from it just as a chant can be recognized from its opening word.[^15]

These formulae also serve as memory aids for cantors learning the large repertoire of liturgical melodies.[^5] A group of notes can recur at a higher or lower pitch or in sequences, and a single formula can be used in different melodies.[^6] Kuhn emphasizes that a formula’s significance comes from its position in the melody rather than from any special character of its own.[^7]

In her general description of Coptic melodies, Kuhn observes that intervals—the distances between successive notes—are normally small.[^16] The high, middle, or low placement of a chant within a vocal register has no symbolic meaning in this account; it is chosen for vocal convenience and can be adapted to the individual singer.[^17]

## Vocalises and meditative purpose

Kuhn’s discussion of the formulae used in festal and other melodies belongs to a wider account of Coptic vocal ornamentation, in which a melismatic melody places a group of notes on one syllable of an important word.[^18] Vocalises, called **al-hazzāt** in Arabic, meaning “vibration,” are an especially extended form of melismatic singing and a characteristic specialty of Coptic music.[^19]

Kuhn also distinguishes neumatic melodies, in which one or two notes are placed on an important syllable in the middle or at the end of a verse.[^61]

A vocalise is placed on one or two vowels of an important word, while other words may be bound together; Kuhn reports that cantors regard vowels, rather than the grammatical construction of the text, as the essential element in these passages.[^20] In this practice, the vowels “i” and “e” usually become “ei,” whereas “a,” “o,” and “u” become “aw” or “ow.”[^21]

Kuhn gives a general duration of between one and twenty minutes for a vocalise, depending on the day, occasion, and liturgical feast, but particularly on the cantor’s knowledge and skill.[^22] She identifies the purpose of vocalises as inducing a deep meditative state.[^23] Such ornamentation is nevertheless governed by traditional rules and performed within a particular musical structure and metric rhythm, rather than as unrestricted embellishment.[^24]

## Oral transmission and variation

The wider tradition in which the festal tune is transmitted relies on oral teaching and rote learning from person to person and generation to generation; the manuscripts and books surveyed preserve texts and rubrics rather than a notation designed specifically for Coptic music.[^25] Cantors know their melodies by heart, and mnemonic support can be found in chant texts as well as in musical structures.[^26]

A concrete example of textual mnemonics in the broader repertoire is provided by the Psalis, metrical hymns accompanying a Theotokia or *hos*: their strophes are often arranged alphabetically in Coptic or Greek, sometimes as double or reverse acrostics, to help singers perform the complete hymn without omissions.[^47] Most Psalis are assigned to Adam or Batos according to the weekday, but some instead name another familiar Psali or hymn whose melody is to be used.[^48]

Arabic names for the Psali include *absaliyyah* and *madih*, plural *mada’ih*, the latter meaning praise or laudation.[^62] Each Psali has between twenty-six and forty-six strophes, each a rhymed quatrain, although the rhyme schemes vary.[^63] A characteristic contributing to their popularity is the refrain, usually a repetition of the fourth line, but sometimes of both the third and fourth lines—a feature rare in the ritual pieces of the liturgies and canonical hours, the *hos*, and the Theotokia.[^64]

Psalis, apart from a few paraphrases reserved for Kiyahk, are the only pieces of Coptic music whose authors are identified within their texts.[^65] An author’s name may be embedded in a strophe together with a plea for mercy and forgiveness and a humble description of the writer as a poor servant or sinner.[^66] In the paraphrases, names may instead appear through the initial letters of successive strophes or of a series of hymns.[^67] Detailed editions using manuscripts from the fourteenth and eighteenth centuries demonstrate the authors’ skill in Coptic rhyme and rhythm.[^68] Musically, the Psalis are rhythmic and syllabic, with little melisma or improvisation, a range usually spanning four or at most five tones, and a quasi-parlando, or speech-like, style.[^69]

This preservation has been interpreted as a sacred trust, with the music deliberately not transcribed lest it fall into the wrong hands.[^27] Musical instruction is strict and rigid.[^28]

Undeciphered signs in Coptic manuscripts probably dating from the tenth or eleventh centuries are held in the Rylands Library at Manchester and the Insinger Collection at the Leiden Museum of Antiquities; their possible identification as an abandoned form of ekphonetic notation remains tentative.[^49]

Marian Robertson investigated the reliability of oral transmission by comparing transcriptions of the same piece made decades apart by different scholars, finding indications that simpler melodies may have remained intact for centuries.[^29] Comparisons of recordings made years apart at the Institute of Coptic Studies similarly showed unchanged basic melodies and embellishments occurring in the same positions despite slight variation, especially in choral compositions.[^30] Solo performances, by contrast, showed variation and improvisation particularly in embellishments and melismata.[^31]

### Language and melodic continuity

The Arab conquest of 642/643 introduced a new religion and language without changing Coptic rituals.[^70] Coptic remained in general Christian use as late as Patriarch Zacharias’s reign (1004–1032), and although the Gospels and other church books had been translated into Arabic under Patriarch Philotheus (979–1003), Cyril II continued to celebrate the Divine Liturgy entirely in Coptic.[^71] Manuscripts from the seventh through nineteenth centuries preserve ancient hymn texts in Greek, Greco-Coptic, and Coptic with little or no alteration, a continuity tentatively suggesting that their music also remained essentially intact.[^72]

Hymn titles and rubrics sometimes identify linguistic origins, at least for the texts: many are designated *Rumi*, referring to Byzantium or New Rome.[^73] Other designations include *Beheiri* for northern Egypt, *Sa‘idi* for southern Egypt, and *Masri* for central Egypt, regions with distinctive dialects.[^74]

Arabic versions of Coptic liturgical texts tend to have simpler, shorter, and less ornamented melodies, raising concerns particularly about the preservation of extended vocalises.[^50] Nevertheless, the few comparative studies available indicated that basic melodic lines and rhythms remained intact and that ornamentation was retained to a remarkable degree, although firmer conclusions required much more comparison.[^51]

A specific example from the Holy Week repertoire is the hymn whose opening means “Remember me, O Lord” [*aripamevi o pachois*; *mnésthetí mou kyrie*], sung at the Sixth Hour on Good Friday first in Coptic and then in Greek without a change of music.[^75] The Maundy Thursday song “Judas, Judas” [*Ioudas, Ioudas*; *Yahudha, Yahudha*], sung in Greek and Arabic, is likewise cited as an example supporting melodic continuity across languages.[^76]

## Modern preservation and documentation

A major figure in the preservation of the broader chant tradition was Mu‘allim Mikha’il Jirjis (1873–1957), the blind master chanter of Saint Mark’s Cathedral in Cairo, who learned from older masters and transmitted the repertoire through his pupils.[^32] When the Higher Institute for Coptic Studies was founded in 1954, he collaborated with Raghib Muftah, the head of its Coptic music department.[^33]

The account of Mikha’il’s training particularly names Mu‘allim Armaniyus and Mu‘allim Salib as earlier specialists in tunes he learned, and emphasizes the role of ancient monasteries in maintaining the conservative traditions from which his repertoire developed.[^52] From 1879 to 1881 he attended the Coptic elementary school of Abu al-Sa‘d in Cairo’s Azbakiyyah quarter, studying Psalms, hymns, Coptic, and Arabic.[^53] He subsequently attended the Coptic Clerical College under Yusuf Manqariyus, graduated in 1893, and was appointed a teacher of church music there.[^54] In 1895 he was asked to teach ritual, religion, Coptic, and Arabic at the school for the blind in Zeitoun, where he taught Arabic through Braille and adapted the same method to the Coptic alphabet.[^55] His work also included translating the Coptic service into Arabic with the cathedral priest Qummus Philuthawus Ibrahim and correcting Coptic pronunciation through the teaching of elocution.[^56]

Cyril V selected Mikha’il as the cathedral’s church singer and as a teacher of church music at the Clerical College.[^77] Some of the pupils who continued his legacy through his classes for religious cantors were themselves blind.[^78]

Documentation of the services associated with festal singing includes *The Coptic Marriage Service*, edited by Ragheb Moftah and recorded at the Higher Institute of Coptic Studies in Cairo in 1984.[^34] The institute also recorded *The Ritual for the Feast of the Resurrection*, edited by Moftah, in Cairo in 1974.[^35]

Related documentation of the psalmody includes Moftah’s editions of *The Order of Evening Prayers* (1976), *The Order of Midnight Prayers* (1978), and *Doxologies and Their Hymns for the Virgin Mary and the Saints* (1984), all recorded at the Higher Institute of Coptic Studies in Cairo.[^79]

Comparative documentation of the broader repertoire included a 1976 master’s thesis on Coptic music and its relation to Pharaonic music, which transcribed and analyzed one hymn as performed by several choirs; its author was a violin teacher in Helwan University’s Faculty of Music Education and a member of the Arabic Classical Music Ensemble.[^57] Western notation was not designed for Coptic music, but comparison among scholars’ transcriptions provides a means of appreciating the tradition’s complexity and variety.[^58]

## Distinction from nonliturgical songs

The term *alhan* is also applied to a modern nonliturgical Sunday-school repertoire, within which thirteen songs composed in honor of the Virgin Mary are designated *taranim*, singular *tarnimah*.[^80] These songs are stylistically distinct from Coptic liturgical melody and influenced by Western music, with violin, piano, and/or organ accompaniment, rudimentary harmony, and occasional borrowings from familiar Western melodies.[^81] Their praise and worship texts are strophic, and men and women sing them antiphonally or in unison in a monophonic vocal line.[^82] They appealed to young people and drew criticism from Coptic purists who considered them lacking in the dignity and spirituality of the ancient liturgical tradition.[^83]

## Frequently asked questions

**When is the festal tune used?**
Al-faraiḥī is used for feasts, weddings, and baptisms; Palm Sunday and feasts of the Cross have a separately named melody type, al-sha‘anīnī.

**Is the festal tune part of the eight-mode Oktoechos?**
No. Kuhn classifies Coptic melodies by liturgical occasion rather than by the eight-mode Oktoechos.

**How much freedom does a cantor have in performing it?**
The opening formula is fixed by tradition and identifies the melody, while later formulae allow greater freedom of selection and placement.

**Why can Coptic vocalises be so long?**
Their length depends on the occasion and the cantor’s knowledge and skill; Kuhn describes their purpose as inducing a deep meditative state.

**How has the chant tradition been preserved?**
Through oral teaching, rote learning, and mnemonic patterns, supplemented in modern times by recordings and scholarly transcriptions.

## Sources
[^1]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 3)
[^2]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^3]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^4]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^5]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^6]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^6]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^7]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 3)
[^8]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 3)
[^9]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 184)
[^9]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^10]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 184)
[^11]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 184)
[^12]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 78)
[^13]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 78)
[^14]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 3)
[^15]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^16]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 3)
[^17]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 3)
[^18]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^19]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^20]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^21]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^22]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^23]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^24]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^25]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 88)
[^26]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^27]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 88)
[^28]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 88)
[^29]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 88)
[^30]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 88)
[^31]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 88)
[^32]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 685)
[^33]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 685)
[^34]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 118)
[^35]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 119)
[^36]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 678)
[^37]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 78)
[^38]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 78)
[^39]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 78)
[^40]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 78)
[^41]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 72)
[^42]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 106)
[^43]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 106)
[^44]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 594)
[^45]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 594)
[^46]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 594)
[^47]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^48]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^49]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 99)
[^50]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 90)
[^51]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 90)
[^52]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 685)
[^53]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 685)
[^54]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 685)
[^55]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 685)
[^56]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 686)
[^57]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 117)
[^58]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 117)
[^59]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 72)
[^60]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 7, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 594)
[^61]: Coptic Melodies: Structure and Significance, Magdalena Kuhn (p. 2)
[^62]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^63]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^64]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^65]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^66]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^67]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^68]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^69]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 83)
[^70]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 99)
[^71]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 99)
[^72]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 99)
[^73]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 90)
[^74]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 90)
[^75]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 90)
[^76]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 90)
[^77]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 685)
[^78]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 686)
[^79]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 118)
[^80]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 117)
[^81]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 117)
[^82]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 117)
[^83]: The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 117)