☦
Saint / historical person
Saints & Martyrs
Church Fathers
History & Councils

Cyril of Jerusalem

Saint Cyril of Jerusalem was a fourth-century bishop and catechetical teacher whose sacramental writings, association with the luminous cross, and later literary reception gave him a prominent place in Coptic tradition.[^1][^4][^5]

Also known as: Saint Cyril of Jerusalem · St. Cyril of Jerusalem · Cyril, Bishop of Jerusalem

Published 10/2/2026Updated 3 revisionsPage history

In brief

Saint Cyril of Jerusalem was a fourth-century bishop of Jerusalem, a teacher of Christian faith and sacramental life, and a saint honored in Egyptian tradition. His importance for Coptic Christianity rests on his catechetical writings, his explanations of worship, and the extensive later literature attributed to him.

Overview

Saint Cyril of Jerusalem was a fourth-century bishop, catechetical teacher, and interpreter of Christian worship. The Egyptian tradition recognized him as orthodox and regarded his character and writings favorably, giving him a prominent place both in Coptic historical memory and in Coptic literature.15 His importance includes teachings on Baptism, anointing, the Eucharist, prayer, and Christian conduct, alongside an extensive later body of homilies circulated under his name.7101319232425

Two aspects of this legacy require distinction: Cyril’s historical teaching and the later literary authority attached to his name. Eighteen authentic Catecheses are distinguished from the spurious homilies of the later “Cyrillian Cycle”; some other isolated works attributed to him may preserve earlier Greek material without thereby being authenticated as his compositions.2526 He should also be distinguished from Cyril of Alexandria, the twenty-fourth patriarch of the See of Saint Mark, whose patriarchate lasted from 412 to 444.37

History and origins

Episcopate and theological controversy

Cyril’s episcopate at Jerusalem lasted approximately from 350 to 387. He obtained the bishopric through the efforts of an Arian-aligned faction, while his doctrine was substantially anti-Arian. His repeated exile was associated with the Arian emperors Constantius, during 357–362, and Valens, during 367–378.1

A separate discussion places Cyril among the moderates who rallied around Basil of Ancyra and the term homoiousion, meaning “of like substance.” This position stood between the Nicene party’s homoousion, “of the same substance,” and the more radical Arians emerging around 355; Melitius of Antioch is named alongside Cyril among these moderates.3

The same account explains that distrust of some Nicene advocates, including fears of Sabellian or modalist Monarchianism, initially obstructed agreement. Through the work of leaders such as Athanasius of Alexandria and Hilary of Poitiers, and increasing concern about radical Arianism, the Homoiousians were brought into the Homoousian camp by the Council of Constantinople in 381.3 Read together, these accounts distinguish the circumstances of Cyril’s appointment and his early theological associations from the Egyptian tradition’s later recognition of his orthodoxy.13

The chronology is not uniform. Cyril’s lifespan is dated approximately to 315–386, whereas his episcopate is also dated as extending to 387 and his year of death is alternatively given as 387. These alternatives remain unresolved here.1228

The luminous cross over Golgotha

The appearance of a shining cross over Golgotha became an especially important episode in Coptic remembrance of Cyril. The account survives in Greek in a letter attributed to him, printed in Patrologia Graeca 33, columns 1165–1176, and in the ecclesiastical histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Philostorgius.4

In Coptic, the event appears in a historical account that mentions the letter and in a homily on the cross also attributed to Cyril. The Copto-Arabic commemoration of the appearance falls on 12 Bashans, citing both the letter and the historical account in the Synaxarion. A Coptic version of the letter is therefore quite probable, but its survival is not established.4

This is a commemoration of the appearance of the cross, not a date identified in these passages as Cyril’s personal feast. Its transmission through a letter, historical writing, homiletic literature, and the Synaxarion illustrates the different forms through which his association with Jerusalem entered Coptic religious memory.4

Theology and meaning

Baptism, water, and the Holy Spirit

Cyril’s Catechetical Lectures 3 and 4 are cited among patristic explanations distinguishing Christian baptism from earlier baptisms. In this account, John’s baptism prepares for the fuller remission, sanctification, and gift of the Holy Spirit associated with Christ. Cyril is also named among the Fathers who expounded baptism’s role in purification, forgiveness, spiritual regeneration, and salvation.7

One quotation makes the relation between the visible element and divine action explicit: “When you go down into the water, then regard not simply the water, but look for salvation through the power of the Holy Spirit.” Cyril continues that both are necessary and grounds the teaching in the authority of Jesus Christ. His explanation therefore directs attention beyond water alone without treating water as dispensable.8

Anointing before and after baptism

Anointing took place before entry into the font: “When ye were stripped, ye were anointed with exorcised oil, from the very hairs of your head to the soles of your feet.” The candidates were then led by the hand to baptism. This testimony concerns prebaptismal anointing formerly practiced in both Eastern and Western churches.9

A different anointing follows baptism. A Coptic Church Review discussion of myron quotes Catechetical Lectures 21:1: after emerging from “the pool of the sacred streams,” the newly baptized received an unction identified with the Holy Spirit. The article uses Cyril alongside Cyprian and Tertullian to explain the Coptic practice of giving myron directly after baptism.10

The Rudder likewise invokes Cyril when explaining chrism as a token of receiving the Holy Spirit’s gracious gift and becoming complete Christians. Its discussion relates this anointing to the Spirit’s descent upon Christ at the Jordan and to participation in Christ. These sources distinguish preparation before baptism from the Spirit-bearing anointing afterward, rather than presenting all ritual oil as having one undifferentiated purpose.91011

Asceticism and pastoral moderation

Cyril’s praise of chastity uses the language of angelic life: its crown is “angelic,” and those practicing it are “angels walking upon earth.” He also associates virgins with Mary the Virgin. This reflects the wider patristic esteem for celibate life devoted to God.23

His treatment of second marriage nevertheless rejects contempt for those who remarry. His teaching states: “Continence is a good and wonderful thing; but still, it is permissible to enter upon a second marriage.” The subject is remarriage after a spouse’s death.24

The same article contrasts Cyril’s relative leniency with Tertullian’s discouragement of remarriage and Ambrose’s position that second marriages should be neither prohibited nor recommended. Cyril’s praise of chastity and his permission for remarriage thus belong together: an ascetic preference does not authorize disdain for those following a permitted alternative.2324

Liturgical and practical use

Washing the hands and purity of conduct

Understanding the Liturgy cites Cyril when explaining the celebrant’s threefold washing of the hands. Cyril describes a deacon providing water to the celebrant and the presbyters around the altar, emphasizing that this is not needed because they entered church physically unwashed. Rather, the ablution signifies the obligation to be free from sins and transgressions.13

His interpretation depends on the symbolism of the hands as instruments of action: washing them expresses purity and blamelessness of conduct. He connects the gesture with Psalm 25:6, “I will wash my hands among the innocent and will circle your altar, O Lord.” The liturgical commentary notes that the priest actually recites this psalm while washing.13

The same teaching on ablution parallels warnings against approaching the sacrifice with a polluted soul. These comparisons explain the ceremony as an ethical summons, not merely bodily cleansing.14

The kiss and the lifting of hearts

The Rudder cites Cyril’s explanation of the liturgical kiss as a sign that the participants’ souls are united and that grudges and revengeful feelings have been banished. Its emphasis is reconciliation: the outward exchange should express an actual disposition toward the other worshippers.15

For the invitation “Lift up your hearts,” Cyril says that the heart must be directed toward God rather than occupied with earthly matters. Understanding the Liturgy quotes him to explain the invitation as a command to put away worldly thoughts at the solemn moment of worship.16 Together with handwashing and the kiss, this explanation connects bodily gestures and spoken responses with purity of action, reconciliation, and inward attention.131516

Creation, angels, and the Sanctus

Cyril’s account of eucharistic thanksgiving includes the heavens, earth, sea, and the whole visible and invisible creation. It names Angels, Archangels, Virtues, Dominions, Principalities, Powers, Thrones, and the many-faced Cherubim, followed by the Seraphim seen by Isaiah around God’s throne.17

The angelic remembrance in this passage is explained through the scriptural invitation, “Magnify the Lord with me.” It is connected with the Sanctus: “Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord of Hosts, heaven and earth are full of Thine holy glory.”1718

The reason for singing is participatory rather than merely descriptive. In the words attributed to Cyril, Christians recite the Seraphim’s doxology “that we may be sharers of the hymnody of the heavenly hosts.” Earthly thanksgiving is thereby presented as joining heavenly praise.17

Intercession and eucharistic reception

Cyril is quoted as a witness to intercession after the spiritual sacrifice or “bloodless worship.” Over this sacrifice, worshippers beseech God for “the common peace of the churches” and “the good estate of the world.” The passage links eucharistic worship with prayer extending beyond the immediate congregation.19

His instructions for receiving Communion describe the left hand supporting the right as a throne prepared for a king. The communicant receives the body of Christ in the hollow of the palm and says “Amen.” This instruction appears in lecture 23.21, with a fuller version in mystagogical lecture 5.2021

The fuller quotation includes cautiously sanctifying the eyes by contact with the received gift and taking care not to lose any “pearl,” explained as a precious particle. These are evidence of historical reception in the hands, not a statement of present Coptic practice.21 The Council in Trullo’s decree of 692 prohibited substituting private gold or silver vessels for the hands, noting the unease such vessels caused among poorer worshippers.20

Baptismal illumination and care of the sick

The newly baptized approached the Church of the Resurrection, or Anastasis, on the eve of the Savior’s resurrection. Coming from the neighboring baptistery in white robes, they filled the darkness with “the brightness of unnumbered lights.” The lighted candles given after baptism were tokens of the inner light just received.12

He is also included among the Fathers who emphasized the significance of the anointing of the sick, together with Origen, John Chrysostom, and Victor, presbyter of Antioch. The supplied passage provides no separate quotation of Cyril on this sacrament, so it establishes his place among its patristic witnesses without furnishing a detailed account of his particular teaching.22

Texts, hymnody, and terminology

Catechetical writings and their Coptic transmission

Cyril’s catechetical lectures belonged to the theological works studied by catechumens, alongside other early Christian instructional and catechetical writings. Such works equipped learners to understand Christian faith concerning the Trinity, Virgin Birth, Crucifixion, Resurrection, Second Coming, sacraments, and ritual amid periods of controversy.6

A Coptic translation of Cyril’s catechetical lectures was adopted very early. Only a few fragments from Book 6 survive, consisting of polemical material concerned with Gnostic and/or Manichaean subjects. Whether a complete translation was ever made therefore remains uncertain.5

The same entry argues that the Mystagogical Catecheses never existed in Coptic. This judgment concerns their ancient translation history: it does not prevent modern Coptic liturgical publications from quoting them, as Understanding the Liturgy repeatedly does when discussing washing, heavenly praise, and intercession.5131719

Titles and technical vocabulary

The supplied sources use several titles and technical expressions for Cyril’s teaching and its reception:

  • Catecheses / Catechetical Lectures: the instructional writings, including eighteen lectures identified as authentic in the discussion of the later literary cycle.26
  • Mystagogical Catecheses / On the Mysteries: titles used when citing explanations of sacramental worship, including angelic remembrance and Communion.171821
  • Homoiousion / homoousion: “of like substance” and “of the same substance,” the theological terms central to the account of Cyril’s fourth-century affiliations.3
  • Myron / meron: the sacramental anointing discussed in Coptic Church Review, which gives meron as a Greek and Coptic word meaning “anointment.”10
  • Sanctus: the Seraphic hymn, “Holy, Holy, Holy,” whose singing Cyril explains as participation in heavenly praise.17
  • De passione, De cruce, In Mariam Virginem: titles meaning “On the Passion,” “On the Cross,” and a work concerning the Virgin Mary, used for later homilies attributed to Cyril.2627

The later Coptic literary tradition

Formation of the Cyrillian Cycle

The growth of the Cyrillian Cycle was connected with interest in Jerusalem and in apocrypha claiming to originate there. Several homilies were intended to supplement the eighteen authentic Catecheses as numbers 19, 20, and 21, accompanied by other additional texts. Their attachment to the catechetical collection is part of their literary history, not evidence that Cyril composed them.2526

The broad overview and the dedicated entry organize the Passion material differently. The overview places a two-part commentary on John within its account of the cycle; the dedicated entry separates a Johannine pair of homilies from a cycle-associated pair drawing on all four Gospels. The distinction is important because several different works bear essentially the same title.2627

Passion homilies and surviving manuscripts

An isolated two-part homily on the Passion forms a single interpretive unit on John 13–20. Its principal manuscripts are Pierpont Morgan Library M594 and M595 in New York; four additional fragmentary codices from the White Monastery were formerly described as unedited.2527

Another isolated homily on the Passion, preserved in Morgan M610, is a late apocryphal work attributed to the apostles. Presented as a homily, it recounts the discovery of a long-forgotten ancient manuscript in a Jerusalem building. This text was likewise formerly described as unedited.27

Within the interconnected cycle, De passione a and b form another two-part unit, drawing citations from all four Gospels rather than following one alone. The broader survey also mentions additional Passion works, including one containing an apocryphal revelation of the risen Jesus to the disciples.2627

The Cross and the figure of Bacheus

De cruce combines episodes from earlier manuscripts: Isaac the Samaritan’s miracle involving the cross; a miracle concerning Cleophas and Rufas, identified as relatives of the Virgin; Helena’s recovery of the cross; the story of Eusignius; and the luminous cross. The general cycle survey also associates its legendary material with Constantine and Constantius.2627

One episode introduces Bacheus, a fictitious literary figure. In the homily attributed to Cyril, Bacheus is a presbyter and archimandrite of a small monastery near Aschalon in Palestine; a miracle he performs in connection with the cross brings Isaac the Samaritan to Christianity.28

Although the story is set in Cyril’s fourth-century lifetime, its literary features point to the sixth-century development of homiletic and hagiographical cycles. Bacheus probably became the center of a separate cycle shortly afterward, perhaps early in the seventh century.28

Later titles make him bishop of Maiuma near Gaza and retain the identification that he converted Isaac. A damaged Oslo fragment, University Library 217, supplies this title; eight Naples folios, IB13, 31–38, preserve material from In Honor of the Twelve Apostles, including an “autobiographical” section and the apostles as judges in the Valley of Josaphat.28

Other fragments in Naples IB13, 24–30, and Coptic Museum 9232 appear to belong to an encomium of the Three Young Men of Babylon. There Bacheus presents himself as a disciple of James the Persian, or James Intercisus, intending to visit the martyr’s shrine in Egypt. These developments document the expansion of a literary character originally encountered in Cyril’s attributed cycle, not verified associates of the historical bishop.2829

The Virgin’s life and Dormition

In Mariam Virginem combines material about Mary’s childhood with a Dormition narrative and polemic against groups characterized as having Gnostic tendencies. The dedicated entry relates it to the apocryphal Dormitio Virginis, while distinguishing its version from that found under the name of Evodius of Rome.2627

The Cyril-attributed texts belong to the first major family of Dormition narratives, centered on Jerusalem rather than the preliminary gathering at Bethlehem characteristic of the second family. A Syriac letter attributed to Cyril concerning the Temple may have influenced an episode in the second family; this is a proposed literary relationship, not an authenticated episode of Cyril’s biography.30

The Cyril-related witnesses include a text edited by Forbes Robinson in 1896, corresponding to Morgan M597, folios 46–74, and a related version published by Budge in 1915, corresponding to M583, pages 139–157. The latter was also published by Campagnano in 1980.31

These fragmentary works place the Dormition within a broader Life of the Virgin directed against Ebionite and Harpocratian opponents. Their insistence that Mary was not a phantom and that a real tomb existed explains the narrative’s doctrinal purpose: concrete events and witnesses oppose what the texts describe as mere “fantasy.”32

The witnesses named are John, Peter, Verus, and James, associated with the Johannine cycle of Prochorus. An Ethiopic version published in 1974 develops the same connection. Differences between this group and Evodius-related traditions may correspond to Gaianite and Severian traditions.32

The fragmentary text may announce the bodily Assumption on 16 Misra without a visit to the tomb at Gethsemane, but the reconstruction remains open. Elsewhere, this tradition describes Verus, called Bibros in Coptic, collecting Mary’s two linen robes and attributes a church for the feast of her disappearance on the night of 20 Tobe to Constantine and his sons.3233

Cyril also appears within a six-book Dormition legend based on Syriac models and preserved in copies reaching back to the sixth century. Its literary frame has three monks from Sinai discover John’s book at Ephesus at Cyril’s invitation. The narrative incorporates the finding of the Cross and Judas Cyriacus, centers Bethlehem, and ends by invoking apostolic authority for Marian feasts on 24 December, 15 May, and 13 August.33

The Cyril-related Assumption tradition, with its emphasis on John’s disciples Verus and Prochorus, is further connected to Coptic books concerning the enthronement of Michael and Gabriel. These connections demonstrate the reach of the attributed literature beyond a single Marian homily.34

Preservation and significance in Coptic Orthodox life

Cyril’s reception belongs to a wider history of translating patristic homilies into Coptic. Selection was shaped by monastic spiritual needs and a broader audience of relatively simply educated readers, rather than solely by an official program; Cyril of Jerusalem is included among the translated Fathers.36

Material attributed to him also formed part of Egyptian monastic libraries. The fifty-six codices discovered from the monastery of the Archangel Michael at Sopehes in the Fayyum were written between 820 and 920 and passed almost entirely to the Pierpont Morgan Library. Among their homiletic authors were Cyril and other bishops from both Egyptian and non-Egyptian cities; Hyvernat published the collection in facsimile in 1922.35

In the modern Coptic publications supplied here, Cyril remains a resource for explaining worship rather than only an object of historical study. His words clarify why hands are washed, hearts lifted, the Sanctus sung, intercessions offered, and the baptized anointed. Their recurring concern is the relationship between an outward act and the spiritual reality it expresses: moral purity, attention to God, communion with heavenly praise, and reception of the Holy Spirit.1013161719

His Coptic significance is therefore both theological and literary. The historical teacher supplies enduring explanations of sacramental life, while the later works attributed to him preserve traditions concerning Jerusalem, the Cross, and the Virgin. Keeping these categories distinct respects both the Egyptian recognition of Cyril as orthodox and the largely pseudonymous character of the later corpus.1252627

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Who was Saint Cyril of Jerusalem?
Cyril was a fourth-century bishop of Jerusalem whose teaching was substantially anti-Arian despite the support of an Arian-aligned faction at his appointment. Egyptian tradition recognized him as orthodox and accorded him an important historical and literary position.
What did Cyril of Jerusalem teach about baptism?
Cyril taught that baptism involves both water and the saving power of the Holy Spirit. The sources also cite him on purification, forgiveness of sins, spiritual regeneration, and anointing before and after baptism.
Did Cyril of Jerusalem write all the Coptic homilies attributed to him?
No. The Coptic Encyclopedia distinguishes his authentic Catecheses from a later literary cycle of spurious homilies and other attributed works whose authenticity is doubtful.
What is Cyril’s connection with the appearance of the cross?
A letter attributed to Cyril describes the appearance of a shining cross over Golgotha. The Copto-Arabic Synaxarion commemorates this appearance on 12 Bashans and cites both the letter and an ecclesiastical history.
When did Cyril of Jerusalem die?
The supplied sources differ: several give his lifespan as approximately 315–386, while the encyclopedia’s dedicated entry places his episcopate around 350–387 and its Bacheus entry gives his death as 387.

References

Sources

  1. 1.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 47)
    CYRIL OF JERUSALEM, bishop of Jerusalem (c. 350-387) due to the efforts of the Arianite faction. However, because his doctrine was substantially anti-Arian, he was repeatedly exiled by the Arian emperors Constantius (357-362) and Valens (367-378). The Egyptian tradition recognized him as orthodox and regarded his character and work with favor. Consequently, the Copts accorded him a prominent position both as historic and as a literary figure.
  2. 2.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 46)
    Similar interpretations permeate the writings of other Fathers, such as ATHANASIUS of Alexandria (c. 296-373) in the Treatise on Matthew 3, CYRIL OF JERUSALEM (c. 315-386) in Catechetical Lecture 3 and 4, and Augustine (354-430) in Epistle 51.
  3. 3.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 4 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 630)
    HOMOIOUSION, term meaning "of like substance" and used by many who were caught between the extremes of the Nicene party (HOMOOUSION, "of the same substance") and the radical Arians who had emerged about 355. The great majority of moderates rallied under Basil of Ancyra around the compromise homoiousion, among them Melitius of Antioch and CYRIL OF JERUSALEM. Through the statesmanship of such orthodox leaders as Athanasius and Hilary of Poitiers, the Homoiousions, who were not far removed from the orthodox position and were increasingly apprehensive of the threat of ARIANISM, were brought into t
  4. 4.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 47)
    In Coptic history, the episode involving the appearance of the shining cross upon Golgotha has become especially well known. This story appears in Greek in a letter attributed to Cyril (PG 33, cols. 1165-76), and in various ecclesiastical histories (Socrates 2.28; Sozomen 4.5; Philostorgius 3.26). In Coptic we find this event recorded in the HISTORIA ECCLESIASTICA, with a mention of the letter cited above, and in a homily, De cruce, likewise attributed to Cyril ... Further, on 12 Bashans, the Copto-Arabic SYNAXARION celebrates this appearance of the cross ... Therefore, it is quite probable th
  5. 5.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 47)
    In Coptic literature, a translation of his Catecheses ... was adopted at a very early date. However, since only a few fragments taken from Book 6—polemic, Gnostic, and/or Manichaean—remain, we are not certain if the translation is complete. There is certainly enough evidence for us to assume that his Mystagogical Catecheses never existed in Coptic.
  6. 6.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 404)
    Catechumens studied various theological works, including the Didache (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles), two books by Clement of Alexandria—the Protreptikos and the Instructor of Children—the Catecheses of CYRIL OF JERUSALEM, and De catechizandis rudibus of Augustine. These were compiled during the most critical and controversial periods in the history of Christianity to equip catechumens with a proper understanding of the principles of faith regarding the Trinity, the Virgin Birth, the Crucifixion, the Resurrection, the Second Coming, as well as the sacraments and ritual of the church.
  7. 7.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 46)
    This basic distinction between Christian baptism and earlier baptisms was clearly brought out in the writings of the early fathers. ... Similar interpretations permeate the writings of other Fathers, such as ... CYRIL OF JERUSALEM (c. 315-386) in Catechetical Lecture 3 and 4 ... The effect of baptism in purification, remission of sins, and spiritual regeneration makes it an essential, indispensable element for salvation. This inherent feature was also amply expounded by several of the fathers, such as ... Saint Cyril of Jerusalem.
  8. 8.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 4 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 714)
    Saint Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 315-386) wrote, "When you go down into the water, then regard not simply the water, but look for salvation through the power of the Holy Spirit. For without both you cannot attain to perfection. It is not I who say this, but the Lord Jesus Christ, who has the power in this matter" ("Catechetical Lectures," in Jurgens, 1970-1979, Vol. 1, p. 349).
  9. 9.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 353)
    It is worthy of note that this anointing, as part of the prebaptismal service, was originally practiced by all churches, Eastern and Western alike. ... CYRIL OF JERUSALEM also stated, "Then, when ye were stripped, ye were anointed with exorcised oil, from the very hairs of your head to the soles of your feet. After that ye were led by the hand to the holy font of baptism."
  10. 10.Coptic Church Review, Volume 2, Number 3 (p. 24)
    Like other Orthodox churches, the Coptic church has kept the Apostolic Tradition of giving the Myron directly after Baptism ... The sacrament has its name from the Greek and Coptic word meron which means anointment. ... after you have come up from the pool of the sacred streams, there was given an Unction . . . and this is the Holy Spirit. (St. Cyril of Jerusalem: Catechetical Lectures, 21:1)
  11. 11.The Rudder (Pedalion) of the Metaphorical Ship of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church of Orthodox Christians — Agapios, a Hieromonk and Nicodemos, a Monk (p. 1156)
    Anointment with holy myrrh denotes the descent of the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove upon Christ when He was being baptized in the .Jordan; and consequently, according to Cyril of Jerusalem the chrism is a token that we are receiving in baptism the gracious gift of the Holy Spirit ... and are becoming perfect Christians. Hence we are called Christians not only because we believe in Christ, but also because we get anointed with that heavenly chrism, becoming christs of the Lord and partakers of Christ.
  12. 12.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 334)
    Catechumens used to be given lighted candles immediately after being baptized as a token of the inner light they had just acquired. Saint CYRIL OF JERUSALEM (c. 315-386) vividly describes the practice that illuminated the dark night during Easter celebration at the Church of the Resurrection: "... on the eve of the Savior's resurrection, and at the doors of the Church of the Anastasis, the white-robed band of the newly baptized was seen approaching from the neighboring baptistery, and the darkness was turned into day in the brightness of unnumbered lights."
  13. 13.Understanding the Liturgy — Father Athanasius Iskander (p. 7)
    The priest would then wash his hands three times. ... Saint Cyril of Jerusalem (fourth century) explains it this way: You saw, then, the deacon who offers the water for the washing of the hands of the celebrant and to the presbyters who encircle the altar of God. Not that he offered this water on account of any bodily uncleanness, for we did not enter the church unwashed; rather the ablution is a symbol of our obligation to be clean from all sins and transgressions. The hands symbolize action. So by washing them we signify plainly the purity and blamelessness of our conduct. ... The Psalm allu
  14. 14.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 28)
    CYRIL OF JERUSALEM writes, "Ye saw the deacon who gave to the priest and to the elders surrounding the altar of God, water to wash their hands. . . . The washing of hands is a symbol of guiltlessness of sins" ... It is a practice underlined by Saint JOHN CHRYSOSTOM ... "Wouldst thou, then, while thus careful in the little matter, draw near having a filthy soul?" ... Likewise, Caesarius of Arles (470-542) says ... "If we are ashamed and afraid to touch the Eucharist with filthy hands, much more ought we to be afraid to receive the same Eucharist in a polluted soul."
  15. 15.The Rudder (Pedalion) of the Metaphorical Ship of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church of Orthodox Christians — Agapios, a Hieromonk and Nicodemos, a Monk (p. 1149)
    Cyril of Jerusalem, in his Catechesis 5, asserts that the kiss is a sign, or token, that the souls of the kissers are united, and that they have eliminated and banished every grudge from their persons. "The kiss," he says, "is a sign that the souls have merged their personalities, and are banishing every revengeful feeling."
  16. 16.Understanding the Liturgy — Father Athanasius Iskander (p. 44)
    Saint Cyril of Jerusalem tells us that, The priest cries, “Lift up your hearts!”, for truly is it necessary at that most awesome hour to have one’s heart on high towards God, and not below, occupied with earth and the things of earth. In effect, then, the priest commands everyone at that very hour to banish worldly thoughts
  17. 17.Understanding the Liturgy — Father Athanasius Iskander (p. 50)
    Saint Cyril of Jerusalem summarizes for us this part of the Liturgy by saying, After that we call to mind the heavens, the earth and the sea ..., the whole rational and irrational creation, both visible and invisible, Angels and Archangels, Virtues, Dominions, Principalities, Powers, Thrones, and the many faced Cherubim ... We call to minds also the Seraphim, whom Isaiah, in the Holy Spirit, saw encircling the throne of God ... The people now sing this beautiful hymn, “Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord of Hosts, heaven and earth are full of Thine holy glory.” ... “We recite this doxology which comes to u
  18. 18.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 339)
    According to CYRIL OF JERUSALEM (c. 315-386), "After this we make mention of heaven . . . of the Angels, Archangels, Virtues, Dominations, Principalities, Powers, Thrones, of the Cherubim with many-faces: in effect repeating that call of David's, 'Magnify the Lord with me.' We make mention also of the Seraphim . . ." (On the Mysteries 5.6 ...).
  19. 19.Understanding the Liturgy — Father Athanasius Iskander (p. 71)
    Intercessions have always been a part of the Liturgy as attested by St. Cyril of Jerusalem. When the spiritual sacrifice, the bloodless worship has been completed, over this sacrifice of propitiation we beseech God for the common peace of the churches, for the good estate of the world ... we all pray and offer this sacrifice.
  20. 20.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 4 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 145)
    Saint CYRIL OF JERUSALEM (c. 315-386) states, "When thou goest to receive communion go not with thy wrists extended, not with thy fingers separated, but placing thy left hand as a throne for thy right, which is to receive so great a king, and in the hollow of the palm receive the body of Christ, saying 'Amen'" (Catechetical Lectures 23.21). ... some wealthy persons ... started to bring their own golden or silver vessels ... Such a practice led to some unease on the part of the poorer members of the congregation. Consequently the Council in Trullo, in 692, laid down Decree 101
  21. 21.The Rudder (Pedalion) of the Metaphorical Ship of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church of Orthodox Christians — Agapios, a Hieromonk and Nicodemos, a Monk (p. 882)
    The manner in which laymen in those days used to take the Holy Bread in their hands is more clearly described by Cyril of Jerusalem (Catech. Mystag. 5) ... “But after you have received it, do not fail to sanctify your eyes by touching it cautiously, and thus partake of it, taking care not to drop any pearl (i.e., precious particle) of it,” etc.
  22. 22.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 356)
    Accordingly the early fathers of the church emphasized its significance, among whom were ORIGEN, Saint JOHN CHRYSOSTOM, Cyril of Jerusalem, and Victor, presbyter of Antioch.
  23. 23.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 411)
    CYRIL OF JERUSALEM sees a superhuman quality in chastity: "Let us not be ignorant of the glory of chastity: for its crown is angelic, and its excellence above man. . . . Angels walking upon earth are they who practice chastity: the virgins have their portion with Mary the Virgin."
  24. 24.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 573)
    DIGAMY, practice of remarriage after the death of one's spouse. ... Saint Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 315-386), however, shows more leniency towards digamists: "Those who are once married, let them not hold in contempt those who have accommodated themselves to a second marriage. Continence is a good and wonderful thing; but still, it is permissible to enter upon a second marriage." (Catechetical Lectures 4.26). Saint Ambrose of Milan ... "We do not prohibit second marriages, but neither do we recommend them."
  25. 25.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 47)
    Later, a series of homilies was attributed to Cyril. These are of diverse character, but some of them may be classified together as one of the literary CYCLES typical of the late period of Coptic literature. As such, they are spurious. The others, which stand isolated, are probably spurious as well, but a few might be traced to Greek originals of the fourth and fifth centuries. ... De passione I and II. These two homilies form one unit, which is an exegesis of the Passion as narrated in John 13-20.
  26. 26.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 10)
    Cycle of Cyril of Jerusalem This cycle seems to have its source in an interest in Jerusalem and in a certain type of apocrypha that claimed to originate there ... It consists of several homilies that were to be added to the eighteen authentic Catecheses as numbers 19, 20, and 21, and of certain other additional texts ... On the Passion (divided into two homilies) comments on the relevant passage from John's gospel ... In Praise of the Cross includes many legendary episodes ... On the Virgin includes a description of the childhood of the Virgin and the Dormition. Other homilies would appear to
  27. 27.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 48)
    homilies have been transmitted to us in numerous codices, of which the principal ones are in the Pierpont Morgan Library, New York (M594 and M595); there are also four fragmentary codices from the White Monastery that are as yet unedited. ... De Passione. This late apocryphal work on the Passion is attributed to the apostles. ... It is transmitted in a manuscript in the Pierpont Morgan Library (M610) ... De passione (a and b ...): ... the exegesis of the Passion is based on no particular gospel but contains citations taken from all four. ... De cruce ... incorporates into one unit several epis
  28. 28.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 11)
    BACHEUS, fictitious figure in Coptic literature to whom at least two homilies are attributed. He is mentioned in a homily In Praise of the Cross attributed to CYRIL OF JERUSALEM ... According to this text, Bacheus was a presbyter and archimandrite of a small monastery near Aschalon in Palestine. Because he worked a miracle related to the Cross, a Samaritan named Isaac was converted to Christianity. The period in which the episode is supposed to have occurred is that of Cyril of Jerusalem (d. 387). ... elements gleaned from the homily attributed to Cyril indicate the sixth century ... perhaps t
  29. 29.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 2 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 12)
    In this case he states he is the disciple of the famous martyr James the Persian or JAMES INTERCISUS, and that he intends going to visit his martyrium in Egypt.
  30. 30.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 708)
    The numerous legends of the Assumption may be divided into two groups. ... The apostles assemble close to Mary only in Jerusalem. ... The second group is characterized by a preliminary gathering of the apostles at Bethlehem ... we may consider that the story in the Syriac letter of CYRIL OF JERUSALEM on the destruction of the Temple has influenced an episode in the second legend ... All the texts preserved in Coptic belong to the first form of the legend.
  31. 31.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 709)
    C.2 Cyril of Jerusalem, ed. Forbes Robinson (1896), pp. 24-41, to which corresponds the Pierpont Morgan M 597, fols. 46-74 ... A related version is found in W. Budge (1915), pp. 49-73, which corresponds to the Pierpont Morgan M 583, pp. 139-57, recently published by A. Campagnano (1980), pp. 152-94.
  32. 32.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 710)
    The text C.2 is unfortunately fragmentary. ... the announcement of the Assumption of the body on 16 Misra may have been made without passing by the tomb at Gethsemane. ... The texts attributed to Cyril of Jerusalem (C.2) replace the Dormition in the more general framework of the Life of the Virgin, which is evoked to counter Ebionite and Harpocratian heretics. ... it has to be shown that there really is a tomb, and that the Virgin is not a phantom. The witnesses to the Dormition adduced by C.2 belong to the Johannine cycle of Prochorus: John, Peter, Verus, and James. The Ethiopic version of C.
  33. 33.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 712)
    The legend in six books, based on Syriac models, goes back to copies of the sixth century. ... the finding of the book written by the apostle John. This discovery was made at Ephesus by three monks from Sinai at the invitation of Cyril of Jerusalem. The cycle of the finding of the Cross and of JUDAS CYRIACUS is included in the report of the Dormition. The end of the text alludes to apostolic canons appointing three Marial feasts for 24 December, 15 May, and 13 August. ... The Virgin's two linen robes are collected by Verus (in Coptic, Bibros) in C.2, which also relates the building by Constant
  34. 34.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 1 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 713)
    the book of the enthronement of each archangel, peculiar to the Copts, derives from the tradition about the Assumption of the Virgin, in type C.2, which gives a large place to the disciples of John, Verus, and Prochorus.
  35. 35.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 248)
    the find of fifty-six codices from the monastery of the archangel MICHAEL, situated at Sopehes in the Fayyum, which passed almost completely to the Pierpont Morgan Library. They were written between 820 and 920 in the Fayyum and were published in facsimile by Hyvernat in 1922. ... The sermons are traced back ... to bishops of other, non-Egyptian cities (CYRIL OF JERUSALEM, JOHN CHRYSOSTOM of Constantinople, DEMETRIUS OF ANTIOCH, SEVERUS OF ANTIOCH, Basil the Great of Caesarea, SEVERIAN OF JABALAH)
  36. 36.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 5 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 260)
    The material selected for translation seems to have been chosen chiefly according to the requirements of a special section of Egyptian society, the monastic groups. ... the criterion for selection seems to have been whatever the "normal" market was offering, a market geared more for popular consumption than for the demands of any "official" level. Accordingly, the needs of pleasing simply educated people were also considered. ... we shall simply mention now the names of the church fathers: ATHANASIUS I, BASIL THE GREAT, CYRIL I of Alexandria, CYRIL OF JERUSALEM
  37. 37.The Coptic Encyclopedia, Volume 3 — Aziz S. Atiya (Editor in Chief) (p. 23)
    CYRIL I, SAINT, or Cyril of Alexandria, twenty-fourth patriarch of the See of Saint Mark (412-444)

Explore

Related articles

  • Cronius of Nitria

    Cronius of Nitria was a saint and ascetic associated with Scetis who later served Saint Antony of Egypt and met Palladius in Alexandria.[^1][^2]

  • Saint Verena

    Saint Verena was a fourth-century Egyptian holy woman associated with the Theban Legion, remembered in Switzerland for asceticism, healing, religious instruction, and care for the poor and sick.[^1]

  • Coptic alphabet

    The Coptic alphabet combines predominantly Greek letters with signs derived from demotic Egyptian. Its several varieties reflect the writing traditions of different Coptic dialects.[^1][^2]

  • Islamization of Nubia

    Nubia’s transition from Coptic Christianity to Islam was gradual and regionally varied, involving weakened church institutions, political change, migration, intermarriage, and Sufi teaching.[^1][^5][^7][^8]

  • Pope Mark II

    Saint Mark II was the forty-ninth patriarch of the See of Saint Mark (799–819), a preacher and writer commemorated on 22 Baramudah.[^1]

  • Bohairic Coptic

    Bohairic is a dialect of Coptic attested in Gospel manuscripts, saints’ lives, and liturgical texts, including the Anaphora of Saint Cyril.[^1][^2][^3]

Backlinks

What links here

This article was drafted from the sources listed above with AI assistance and reviewed by an editor before publication.